Talk:Elwood City/@comment-2153449-20111117023257/@comment-2217546-20111117051052

The mention of Springfield in this article is in no way trying to better the Simpsons franchise. You're correct – The Simpsons is for a completely different demographic, however, it is mentioned here to compare the similarities between Springfield and Elwood City in terms of location ambiguity and dispute. For example, it remains entirely unknown in what state or region Elwood City is located in. The same is true for the city of Springfield in the Simpsons. Stating this fact in the article simply draws forward a reference from popular culture – The Simpsons, which many people have knowledge of, regardless of their fondness to the series. This reference brings forth a comparible piece of knowledge that states one similarity between Elwood City and Springfield. They both are located somewhere that is never completely expounded upon, and likely they never will be. The hidden secret as to these cities' locations only gathers one's interest in the series to find out more about it's setting. Chances are the makers of Arthur used the Simpson's setting dispute as an additional device to capture interest and engagement in viewers. Hopefully this clarifies a little. :)